United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation

W.D. Oklahoma

United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation

DecidedSeptember 8, 2025

Docket5:25-cv-00362

StatusUnknown

This text of United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation (United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation, (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED GUARDS OF AMERICA ) LOCAL 100, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-362-R ) BOUTCHANTHARAJ CORPORATION ) d/b/a DFW SECURITY PROTECTIVE ) FORCE, ) ) Defendants. ORDER

The Court previously determined that the entry of a default judgment against Defendant was appropriate but requested Plaintiff provide additional information regarding the amount of damages requested. See Order dated August 7, 2025 [Doc. No. 8]. Plaintiff has now submitted a Supplemental Brief [Doc. No. 12] clarifying the amount and character of damages it seeks. After considering the information, the Court finds as follows. Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendant to confirm and enforce an arbitration award. Plaintiff has submitted the arbitration order [Doc. No. 1-1] and supplemental award [Doc. No. 1-2] setting out the arbitrator’s ruling and award, which includes the total amount of compensation and interest rate. Plaintiff’s supplemental brief includes the total amount due, including principal and interest. Based on this information, default judgment to enforce the arbitration award is appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 and no hearing as to the amount of damages is necessary. See United States v. Craighead, 176 F. App'x 922, 925 (10th Cir. 2006) (“If defendant does not contest the amount prayed for in the complaint by failing to answer and the claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation, the judgment generally will be entered for that amount without any further hearing.” United States v. Craighead, 176 F. App'x 922, 925 (10th Cir. 2006) (quotation and brackets omitted). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion [Doc. No. 7] requesting the entry of default judgment is GRANTED. The Court confirms, recognizes, and enforces the Arbitrator's order and supplemental award in favor of Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8" day of September, 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED GUARDS OF AMERICA ) LOCAL 100, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-362-R ) BOUTCHANTHARAJ CORPORATION ) d/b/a DFW SECURITY PROTECTIVE ) FORCE, ) ) Defendants. ORDER

The Court previously determined that the entry of a default judgment against Defendant was appropriate but requested Plaintiff provide additional information regarding the amount of damages requested. See Order dated August 7, 2025 [Doc. No. 8]. Plaintiff has now submitted a Supplemental Brief [Doc. No. 12] clarifying the amount and character of damages it seeks. After considering the information, the Court finds as follows. Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendant to confirm and enforce an arbitration award. Plaintiff has submitted the arbitration order [Doc. No. 1-1] and supplemental award [Doc. No. 1-2] setting out the arbitrator’s ruling and award, which includes the total amount of compensation and interest rate. Plaintiff’s supplemental brief includes the total amount due, including principal and interest. Based on this information, default judgment to enforce the arbitration award is appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 and no hearing as to the amount of damages is necessary. See United States v. Craighead, 176 F. App'x 922, 925 (10th Cir. 2006) (“If defendant does not contest the amount prayed for in the complaint by failing to answer and the claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation, the judgment generally will be entered for that amount without any further hearing.” United States v. Craighead, 176 F. App'x 922, 925 (10th Cir. 2006) (quotation and brackets omitted). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion [Doc. No. 7] requesting the entry of default judgment is GRANTED. The Court confirms, recognizes, and enforces the Arbitrator's order and supplemental award in favor of Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8" day of September, 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United Guards of America Local 100 v. Boutchantharaj Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-guards-of-america-local-100-v-boutchantharaj-corporation-okwd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack