United Fruit Co. v. Steele

Fifth Circuit

United Fruit Co. v. Steele

194 F. 1023, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1912

DocketNo. 2,298

StatusPublished

This text of 194 F. 1023 (United Fruit Co. v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Fruit Co. v. Steele, 194 F. 1023, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1260 (5th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been twice argued orally, and has been fully considered, with the aid of elaborate and exhaustive briefs. We have all reached the conclusion that there is no reversible error shown by the record, and that the conclusions of the lower court are sustained by the evidence. The decrees appealed from are therefore affirmed, both on the appeals and the cross-appeal. The appellants are taxed with the costs of the appeals, and the cross-appellants with the costs of the cross-appeal. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been twice argued orally, and has been fully considered, with the aid of elaborate and exhaustive briefs. We have all reached the conclusion that there is no reversible error shown by the record, and that the conclusions of the lower court are sustained by the evidence. The decrees appealed from are therefore affirmed, both on the appeals and the cross-appeal. The appellants are taxed with the costs of the appeals, and the cross-appellants with the costs of the cross-appeal. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 F. 1023, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-fruit-co-v-steele-ca5-1912.