United Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Garvey

19 F. App'x 478
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2001
DocketNos. 00-3847, 00-3848
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 F. App'x 478 (United Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Garvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Garvey, 19 F. App'x 478 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paul Garvey and Fenton, L.L.C., appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of United Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. We agree with the district court that the “unique” living situation of the Garvey family does not afford Paul Garvey an insurable interest in the subject property. Appellants, however, suggested in their brief and contended at oral argument that Paul Garvey obtained the insurance on the property as an agent for his parents as undisclosed principals. There is evidence in the record that James Garvey instructed Paul to obtain the insurance, and that Paul did so at his behest. However, the parties have not fully briefed the agency question to this court. Nor has the district court had adequate opportunity to address the issue. Under the circumstances, we believe it best to remand the case for parties to present the issue to the district court in the first instance.

REMANDED.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-fire-casualty-insurance-v-garvey-ca8-2001.