Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro

United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro

20 A.3d 481, 610 Pa. 393, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1330
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 7, 2011
Docket500 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.3d 481 (United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro, 20 A.3d 481, 610 Pa. 393, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1330 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

*394 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, pursuant to Orsag v. Farmers New Century Insurance, 609 Pa. 388, 15 A.3d 896 (2011) (insureds express designation of UIM coverage in insurance application satisfied statutory requirement that insureds election of UIM coverage in amount lower than coverage amount for bodily injury be in writing), and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration in accordance with Orsag. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. King
20 A.3d 481 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.3d 481, 610 Pa. 393, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-financial-casualty-co-v-fornataro-pa-2011.