United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board

733 F.2d 78, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 669 F.2d 1249
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 8, 1984·No. 80-5777·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F.2d 1475.

The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.

The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board, 733 F.2d 78, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22706 (9th Cir. 1984).

733 F.2d 78 (United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related