United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc. v. DKLS, Inc.

585 So. 2d 1139, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9553, 1991 WL 181489
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1991·No. No. 91-1277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc., appeals from a final order invalidating an attempted levy that was based on a judgment for brokerage fees. We affirm.

Although we sympathize with United Farm’s plight, we agree with the trial court’s ruling that the proper means of executing a judgment is to institute proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1989). Proceedings supplementary to execution are the intended means for a judgment creditor to receive satisfaction of [1140] a judgment. See Advertects, Inc. v. Sawyer Indus., 84 So.2d 21 (Fla.1956).

Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to United Farm to bring proceedings supplementary to execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc. v. DKLS, Inc., 585 So. 2d 1139, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9553, 1991 WL 181489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

585 So. 2d 1139 (United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc. v. DKLS, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arellano v. Bisson
847 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)