United Enterprises, Ltd. v. Hill
This text of 185 A.D.2d 206 (United Enterprises, Ltd. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered March 2, 1992, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of another action pending pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (4), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Service of a summons with notice is insufficient to create a prior action pending pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (4) (Louis R. Shapiro, Inc. v Milspemes Corp., 20 AD2d 857). As plaintiffs did not serve their complaint prior to commencement of the Federal action in Texas, the court herein properly dismissed the complaint. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 A.D.2d 206, 587 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-enterprises-ltd-v-hill-nyappdiv-1992.