United Employers Casualty Co. v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Texas

United Employers Casualty Co. v. McGee

143 S.W.2d 653

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedSeptember 26, 1940

DocketNo. 2286

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 143 S.W.2d 653 (United Employers Casualty Co. v. McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Employers Casualty Co. v. McGee, 143 S.W.2d 653 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This cause was attempted to be removed to this court by writ of error. The defendants in error have filed motions to dismiss the appeal because the writ of error was not perfected in time. The case was tried in the lower court on August 18, 1939. The plaintiff in error participated in the trial. Petition and bond for writ of error were filed in December, 1939, but citation in error was not issued nor served until after January 1, 1940.

In the case of United Employers Casualty Company v. Skinner, 141 S.W.2d 955, we had before us a state of facts almost identical with those found in this case and we there held that the writ of error was not perfected prior to January 1, 1940, and that under the provisions of Acts 1939, 46 Leg., p. 59, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, art. 2249a, the defendant who had participated in the actual trial of the case in the lower court could not have the judgment of the lower court reviewed through writ of error proceedings. The Supreme Court refused writ of error in that case. Based on the hqlding therein, we here hold that this court is without jurisdiction to review this case on writ of error.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This cause was attempted to be removed to this court by writ of error. The defendants in error have filed motions to dismiss the appeal because the writ of error was not perfected in time. The case was tried in the lower court on August 18, 1939. The plaintiff in error participated in the trial. Petition and bond for writ of error were filed in December, 1939, but citation in error was not issued nor served until after January 1, 1940.

In the case of United Employers Casualty Company v. Skinner, 141 S.W.2d 955, we had before us a state of facts almost identical with those found in this case and we there held that the writ of error was not perfected prior to January 1, 1940, and that under the provisions of Acts 1939, 46 Leg., p. 59, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, art. 2249a, the defendant who had participated in the actual trial of the case in the lower court could not have the judgment of the lower court reviewed through writ of error proceedings. The Supreme Court refused writ of error in that case. Based on the hqlding therein, we here hold that this court is without jurisdiction to review this case on writ of error.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.W.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-employers-casualty-co-v-mcgee-texapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack