United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight

133 S.W.2d 601
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight. Read the opinion of the Court — 1940 Tex. App. LEXIS 267
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 1939·No. No. 3617.·Published

Opinion

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This case is now before us on motion by defendant in error to require plaintiff in error to file an additional supersedeas bond. The motion is a companion motion with that filed by the defendant in error in United Employers Casualty Company, plaintiff in error v. Obie Lee Daniels, defendant in error, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W.2d 599, in which by written opinion the motion was granted. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the motion to require an additional supersedeas bond is granted. Plaintiff in error, under the provisions of Art. 2273, R.C.S., will be allowed twenty days from the date of the service of this order in which to file an additional super-sedeas bond to be approved by the clerk of this court. It is the further order of the court that the bond now on file is sufficient as a cost bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight, 133 S.W.2d 601 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

133 S.W.2d 601 (United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Employers Casualty Co. v. Daniels
133 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)