United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight

133 S.W.2d 601
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 4, 1939
DocketNo. 3617.
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.W.2d 601 (United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Employers Casualty Co. v. Knight, 133 S.W.2d 601 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This case is now before us on motion by defendant in error to require plaintiff in error to file an additional supersedeas bond. The motion is a companion motion with that filed by the defendant in error in United Employers Casualty Company, plaintiff in error v. Obie Lee Daniels, defendant in error, Tex.Civ.App., 133 S.W.2d 599, in which by written opinion the motion was granted. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the motion to require an additional supersedeas bond is granted. Plaintiff in error, under the provisions of Art. 2273, R.C.S., will be allowed twenty days from the date of the service of this order in which to file an additional super-sedeas bond to be approved by the clerk of this court. It is the further order of the court that the bond now on file is sufficient as a cost bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Employers Casualty Co. v. Daniels
133 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.W.2d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-employers-casualty-co-v-knight-texapp-1939.