United Electrical Workers of America v. United States

Court of International Trade

United Electrical Workers of America v. United States

18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1177

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedDecember 28, 1994

DocketCourt No. 93-11-00719

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1177 (United Electrical Workers of America v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Electrical Workers of America v. United States, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1177 (cit 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on a motion for further remand. The determination at issue is Color Television Receivers from Korea; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 58 Fed. Reg. 50,333 (Sept. 27, 1993).

By remand order of July 5, 1994, the United States Department of Commerce was directed to calculate an adjustment for value added tax (“VAT”) according to a revised methodology. Plaintiffs now object to that aspect of the calculation whereby U.S. price was increased by an amount for duty drawback prior to application of the VAT rate. Avesta Sheffield, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 94-53 (Mar. 31, 1994), the only case on point, approved this methodology.¹ Plaintiffs demonstrated no error in that opinion. Accordingly, the remand determination at issue is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on a motion for further remand. The determination at issue is Color Television Receivers from Korea; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 58 Fed. Reg. 50,333 (Sept. 27, 1993).

By remand order of July 5, 1994, the United States Department of Commerce was directed to calculate an adjustment for value added tax (“VAT”) according to a revised methodology. Plaintiffs now object to that aspect of the calculation whereby U.S. price was increased by an amount for duty drawback prior to application of the VAT rate. Avesta Sheffield, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 94-53 (Mar. 31, 1994), the only case on point, approved this methodology.¹ Plaintiffs demonstrated no error in that opinion. Accordingly, the remand determination at issue is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-electrical-workers-of-america-v-united-states-cit-1994.