United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Co.
This text of 33 Misc. 771 (United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & S'omers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Misc. 771, 67 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-electric-light-power-co-v-grand-central-real-estate-investment-nyappterm-1900.