United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Blackton

128 N.Y.S. 92
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.Y.S. 92 (United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Blackton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Blackton, 128 N.Y.S. 92 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover for electric light furnished pursuant to a contract signed by “J. Stuart Blackton, Treasurer, C. & C. M. C.” As there is nothing in the contract to indicate that the defendant contracted in other than his individual capacity, the words following his name are mere descriptio personae. No evidence at all was-offered by defendant to the effect that plaintiff knew him to be representing some principal, or that he did, in fact, represent any one but. himself.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 N.Y.S. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-electric-light-power-co-v-blackton-nyappterm-1911.