United Distillers (of America), Ltd. v. Commissioner

1959 T.C. Memo. 46, 18 T.C.M. 207, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 202
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1959
DocketDocket Nos. 60897, 60907.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1959 T.C. Memo. 46 (United Distillers (of America), Ltd. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Distillers (of America), Ltd. v. Commissioner, 1959 T.C. Memo. 46, 18 T.C.M. 207, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 202 (tax 1959).

Opinion

United Distillers (of America), Ltd. v. Commissioner. West Shore Wine & Liquor Co., Inc. v. Commissioner.
United Distillers (of America), Ltd. v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 60897, 60907.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1959-46; 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 202; 18 T.C.M. (CCH) 207; T.C.M. (RIA) 59046;
March 9, 1959
Arthur Groman, Esq., and Maurice Austin, Esq., 350 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y., for the petitioners. John J. O'Toole, Esq., for the respondent.

OPPER

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

OPPER, Judge: In these consolidated proceedings respondent determined the following deficiencies in additions to tax under section 293(b), I.R.C. 1939:

Addition
PetitionerYear Endedto Tax
United Distillers (of
America), Ltd.Sept. 30, 1945$ 40,741.50
West Shore Wine &
Liquor Co., Inc.Mar. 31, 1945105,960.60
Mar. 31, 1946370,733.54

The primary issue is whether petitioners filed, for the years in issue, fraudulent returns with intent to evade tax within the meaning of section 293(b), I.R.C. 1939. If this issue is answered in the affirmative, the following*203 questions must be decided: (1) Whether respondent had authority to issue the statutory notices of deficiency which give rise to these cases; (2) whether deficiencies in additions to tax under section 293(b), I.R.C. 1939, can be determined after the deficiencies in tax have been paid; (3) whether assessment of the deficiencies is barred by the statute of limitations; and (4) whether net operating loss carrybacks must be taken into account in computing additions to tax under section 293(b), I.R.C. 1939.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts were stipulated and are found accordingly.

Petitioner, United Distillers (of America), Ltd., hereafter called U.D.L., a Maryland corporation, filed timely returns for the year in issue on the basis of a fiscal year ended September 30, 1945 with the collector of internal revenue at Baltimore, Maryland. Petitioner, West Shore Wine & Liquor Co., Inc., hereafter called West Shore, a New York corporation, filed timely returns for the years in issue on the basis of fiscal years ended March 31, 1945 and March 31, 1946 with the collector of internal revenue for the third district of New York. West Shore changed its accounting period to the fiscal year*204 ended September 30 commencing with the short period of April 1, 1946 to September 30, 1946.

United Distillers of America, Inc., a New York corporation, named A. Hammer Cooperage Corporation until 1946, hereafter called Cooperage, filed its returns on the basis of a fiscal year ended June 30 until July 1, 1946 when it changed to a fiscal year ended September 30. The books and returns of all of these corporations were prepared according to an accrual method of accounting and their inventories were valued at the lower of cost or market.

Armand Hammer, hereafter called Hammer, and his brother Harry J. Hammer acquired the stock of Cooperage at the time of its incorporation in 1933. In 1943, Cooperage was inactive. Hammer and his brother purchased the stock of West Shore in October 1944 and that of U.D.L. on June 4, 1945. Throughout the years in issue, Hammer was the president of U.D.L., West Shore and Cooperage.

In 1944, 1945 and all material parts of 1946, Government regulations prohibited the use of grains to produce whiskey or grain neutral spirits used in the blending of whiskey. Occasionally this prohibition was relaxed by the declaration of "grain holidays." Throughout these*205 same years the selling price of whiskey and neutral spirits was subject to maximum price regulations and orders issued by the Federal Office of Price Administration, hereafter called the O.P.A.

During the periods in issue aged whiskey was a scarce commodity. A great part of the whiskey sold was blended whiskey, made by mixing a straight aged whiskey with neutral spirits. When whiskey blended with neutral spirits distilled from grain was freely available, whiskey blended with cane spirits or vegetable spirits was not marketable. Whiskey made with cane spirits was more acceptable than whiskey made with vegetable spirits. During periods of scarcity of grain spirits, it was possible to exchange vegetable spirits for aged whiskey by selling the spirits and buying the whiskey at O.P.A. ceiling prices. The conditions of supply and demand in the liquor industry for products such as cane and vegetable spirits and corn whiskey fluctuated frequently, depending largely on the actual or rumored imminence of grain holidays.

Early in 1944 Cooperage entered the whiskey business through the purchase of American Distilling Co.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. Commissioner
14 T.C. 846 (U.S. Tax Court, 1950)
Switzer v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 759 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Kilpatrick v. Commissioner
22 T.C. 446 (U.S. Tax Court, 1954)
Kellett v. Commissioner
5 T.C. 608 (U.S. Tax Court, 1945)
Gano v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 518 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)
Godwin v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 485 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1936)
Saven Corp. v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 343 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1959 T.C. Memo. 46, 18 T.C.M. 207, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-distillers-of-america-ltd-v-commissioner-tax-1959.