United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.

Supreme Court

United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.

346 U.S. 936, 74 S. Ct. 374, 98 L. Ed. 425, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2692

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 18, 1954

DocketNo. 188

StatusPublished

This text of 346 U.S. 936 (United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp., 346 U.S. 936, 74 S. Ct. 374, 98 L. Ed. 425, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2692 (1954).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia is granted limited to the following question:

“In view of the type of-conduct found by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia to have been carried out by Petitioners, does the National Labor Relations Board have exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter so as to preclude the State Court from hearing and determining the issues in a common-law tort action based upon this conduct?”

The Government is invited to submit a memorandum setting forth the policy of the National Labor Relations Board in regard to: (1) the proviso in § 10 (a), 61 Stat. 146,29 U. S. C. (Supp. Ill) § 160 (a); and (2) other cases, apart from those in § 10 (a), in which the Board declines to exercise its statutory jurisdiction.' The memorandum should indicate by what standards the Board declines to act and whether the standards are applied by rule or regulation or on a case-by-case method.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia is granted limited to the following question:

“In view of the type of-conduct found by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia to have been carried out by Petitioners, does the National Labor Relations Board have exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter so as to preclude the State Court from hearing and determining the issues in a common-law tort action based upon this conduct?”

The Government is invited to submit a memorandum setting forth the policy of the National Labor Relations Board in regard to: (1) the proviso in § 10 (a), 61 Stat. 146,29 U. S. C. (Supp. Ill) § 160 (a); and (2) other cases, apart from those in § 10 (a), in which the Board declines to exercise its statutory jurisdiction.' The memorandum should indicate by what standards the Board declines to act and whether the standards are applied by rule or regulation or on a case-by-case method.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 U.S. 936, 74 S. Ct. 374, 98 L. Ed. 425, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-construction-workers-v-laburnum-construction-corp-scotus-1954.