United China & Glass Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

United China & Glass Co. v. United States

71 Cust. Ct. 67, 1973 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3373

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 17, 1973

DocketC.D. 4475; Court No. 70/55738

StatusPublished

This text of 71 Cust. Ct. 67 (United China & Glass Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United China & Glass Co. v. United States, 71 Cust. Ct. 67, 1973 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3373 (cusc 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise at bar, consisting of cups and saucers, was classified in liquidation under TSUS item 533.73 as [68]*68articles chiefly used for preparing, serving, or storing food or beverages or food or beverage ingredients at the duty rate of 40 per centum ad valorem and 9 cents per dozen pieces. It is claimed by the plaintiff-importer that the merchandise should be classified under TSUS item 534.94 as ornamental articles of nonbone chinaware or subporcelain at the duty rate of 40 per centum ad valorem.

In its complaint plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the subject merchandise consists of decorated porcelain cups and saucers not containing 25% or more of calcined bone, which are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company, 47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719 (1959), W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States, 53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484 (1964), or New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 585, C.D. 3463 (1968), and requests that judgment issue directing the district director to reliqui-date the involved entry under item 534.94 in accordance with its claim. In its answer the defendant admits all of the allegations of the complaint, and requests that judgment issue directing reliquidation of the involved entry in accordance with plaintiff’s claim herein.

In the cases cited in the complaint the merchandise consisted of various types of decorated china or porcelain cups and saucers which, under counterpart provisions of the predecessor Tariff Act, had been classified as “tableware” by the collector. In all of these cases classification was overruled by the courts which held that the cups and saucers were chiefly used for decorative or other nonutilitarian purposes at the time of their importation. In the instant case the defendant admits that the involved cups and saucers are not “tableware” but are chiefly used for decorative or other nonutilitarian purposes. Consequently, since the pleadings fail to raise any triable issue in the case, the necessity for further proceedings in this action is obviated.

Plaintiff’s claim for classification of the subject merchandise under item 534.94 is sustained. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise at bar, consisting of cups and saucers, was classified in liquidation under TSUS item 533.73 as [68]*68articles chiefly used for preparing, serving, or storing food or beverages or food or beverage ingredients at the duty rate of 40 per centum ad valorem and 9 cents per dozen pieces. It is claimed by the plaintiff-importer that the merchandise should be classified under TSUS item 534.94 as ornamental articles of nonbone chinaware or subporcelain at the duty rate of 40 per centum ad valorem.

In its complaint plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the subject merchandise consists of decorated porcelain cups and saucers not containing 25% or more of calcined bone, which are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company, 47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719 (1959), W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States, 53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484 (1964), or New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 585, C.D. 3463 (1968), and requests that judgment issue directing the district director to reliqui-date the involved entry under item 534.94 in accordance with its claim. In its answer the defendant admits all of the allegations of the complaint, and requests that judgment issue directing reliquidation of the involved entry in accordance with plaintiff’s claim herein.

In the cases cited in the complaint the merchandise consisted of various types of decorated china or porcelain cups and saucers which, under counterpart provisions of the predecessor Tariff Act, had been classified as “tableware” by the collector. In all of these cases classification was overruled by the courts which held that the cups and saucers were chiefly used for decorative or other nonutilitarian purposes at the time of their importation. In the instant case the defendant admits that the involved cups and saucers are not “tableware” but are chiefly used for decorative or other nonutilitarian purposes. Consequently, since the pleadings fail to raise any triable issue in the case, the necessity for further proceedings in this action is obviated.

Plaintiff’s claim for classification of the subject merchandise under item 534.94 is sustained. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Cust. Ct. 67, 1973 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-china-glass-co-v-united-states-cusc-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack