United China & Glass Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United China & Glass Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 167
United States Customs Court·Decided December 1, 1959·No. No. 63548; protest 58/18429 (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of napkin holders or trivets used in the household and that if the protest were before the collector for review, he would concede the correctness of plaintiff’s claim as to the frame portion, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The tile portion was held properly dutiable as assessed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United China & Glass Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 415 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 415 (United China & Glass Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.