United China & Glass Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

United China & Glass Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 402

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United China & Glass Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 167 →

United States Customs Court·Decided October 25, 1956·No. No. 60307; protest 270938-K/14615 (New Orleans)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was orally stipulated that the merchandise, described as leaf bonbons, valued at $2.36 per dozen pieces, was not tableware; that duty was assessed on said merchandise inadvertently at 70 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces; and that, if the entry were now before the collector for review, he would return the leaf bonbons as claimed. In view of this stipulation, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was orally stipulated that the merchandise, described as leaf bonbons, valued at $2.36 per dozen pieces, was not tableware; that duty was assessed on said merchandise inadvertently at 70 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces; and that, if the entry were now before the collector for review, he would return the leaf bonbons as claimed. In view of this stipulation, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

United China & Glass Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 402 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 402 (United China & Glass Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.