United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier

119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 553, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 15, 1902·No. No. 1,097·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a bill for infringement of three reissue patents, all belonging to complainant below and all being for invention adapted to burn kerosene oil with a blue flame in a cook stove. The court below held that reissue patent No. 11,607 to Otto Ewert, and the reissue of patent to Wm. R. Jeavons, No. 11,601, were void for excessive and useless delay in the applications for such reissue, and also that the original claim, carried into the reissued patents to each were void for anticipation in the three Morrill patents, Nos. 44,548, 55>°33> and 60,224, and that the reissued Blackford patent, No. 11,575, w.as so narrowed and limited as to be at most good for the specific structure claimed and described, and that, so limited, the defendant does not infringe. Upon the opinion of District Judge SWAN, as to the points mentioned, this court affirms the decree of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier, 119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 553, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660 (6th Cir. 1902).

119 F. 157 (United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peter T. Coffield & Son v. Spears & Riddle
169 F. 641 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia, 1909)
Cleveland Foundry Co. v. Detroit Vapor Stove Co.
131 F. 740 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1903)