United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier

Sixth Circuit

United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier

119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 553, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 1902

DocketNo. 1,097

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 F. 157 (United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Blue-Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Glazier, 119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 553, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660 (6th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a bill for infringement of three reissue patents, all belonging to complainant below and all being for invention adapted to burn kerosene oil with a blue flame in a cook stove. The court below held that reissue patent No. 11,607 to Otto Ewert, and the reissue of patent to Wm. R. Jeavons, No. 11,601, were void for excessive and useless delay in the applications for such reissue, and also that the original claim, carried into the reissued patents to each were void for anticipation in the three Morrill patents, Nos. 44,548, 55>°33> and 60,224, and that the reissued Blackford patent, No. 11,575, w.as so narrowed and limited as to be at most good for the specific structure claimed and described, and that, so limited, the defendant does not infringe. Upon the opinion of District Judge SWAN, as to the points mentioned, this court affirms the decree of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a bill for infringement of three reissue patents, all belonging to complainant below and all being for invention adapted to burn kerosene oil with a blue flame in a cook stove. The court below held that reissue patent No. 11,607 to Otto Ewert, and the reissue of patent to Wm. R. Jeavons, No. 11,601, were void for excessive and useless delay in the applications for such reissue, and also that the original claim, carried into the reissued patents to each were void for anticipation in the three Morrill patents, Nos. 44,548, 55>°33> and 60,224, and that the reissued Blackford patent, No. 11,575, w.as so narrowed and limited as to be at most good for the specific structure claimed and described, and that, so limited, the defendant does not infringe. Upon the opinion of District Judge SWAN, as to the points mentioned, this court affirms the decree of the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 553, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-blue-flame-oil-stove-co-v-glazier-ca6-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack