United Blower etal v. Lycoming Water & Sewer Auth
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
UNITED BLOWER, INC. : No. 446 MAL 2020 : :
v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court
LYCOMING COUNTY WATER AND : SEWER AUTHORITY G.M. MCCROSSIN, : INC. : : :
v. : : :
LYCOMING COUNTY WATER AND : SEWER AUTHORITY : : :
PETITION OF: LYCOMING COUNTY : WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court err as a matter of law in affirming the trial court’s calculation
of the “cost” of steel products pursuant to the Steel Products Procurement Act, 73 P.S. §
1886, that requires “75% of the cost of the articles, materials and supplies [of a steel
product to] have been mined, produced or manufactured” in the United States?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United Blower etal v. Lycoming Water & Sewer Auth (United Blower etal v. Lycoming Water & Sewer Auth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.