United Automobile Insurance Company v. Professional Medical Group, Inc.
This text of 1 So. 3d 365 (United Automobile Insurance Company v. Professional Medical Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez’s confession of error, we grant petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company’s Petition for Writ of Certioriari. Respondent agrees with petitioner that the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, acting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of the law when it awarded respondent appellate attorney’s fees and costs. The respondent was not the prevailing party in the trial court. Pursuant to Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Company, 944 So.2d 252 (Fla.2006), an appellate court cannot award appellate attorney’s fees to an insured unless the insured prevails on appeal.
Therefore, we conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in this case in granting the fees and costs to respondent. We thus grant the petition and quash the order granting these conditional fees and costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 So. 3d 365, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 554, 2009 WL 188505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-insurance-company-v-professional-medical-group-inc-fladistctapp-2009.