UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, etc.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 17, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1779 Lower Tribunal No. 12-15166 SP ________________
United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,
vs.
Millennium Radiology, LLC, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Natalie Moore, Judge.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM. United Automobile Insurance Company (“United Auto”) appeals
the final judgment entered by the trial court after entry of summary judgment
on the reasonableness of a diagnostic test based on the doctrine of collateral
estoppel. We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in
United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So. 3d
834 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of
these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its
assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel,
therefore, is not satisfied.”).
In light of our decision, we decline to address United Auto’s second
issue on appeal regarding accord and satisfaction since the summary
judgment order entered thereon now becomes a non-final, non-appealable
order.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, etc. (UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.