UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2022·No. 21-0718·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 9, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D21-718

Lower Tribunal No. 13-5270 SP

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,

vs.

Millennium Radiology, LLC, a/a/o Serafin Jaramillo, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D175, D177 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is

not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO (UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.