UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO
This text of UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO (UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 9, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D21-718 Lower Tribunal No. 13-5270 SP ________________
United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,
vs.
Millennium Radiology, LLC, a/a/o Serafin Jaramillo, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge.
Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.
David B. Pakula, P.A. and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United
Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L.
Weekly D175, D177 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws
its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of
collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, A/A/O SERAFIN JARAMILLO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-insurance-company-v-millennium-radiology-llc-aao-fladistctapp-2022.