United Automobile Insurance Company v. Hollywood Injury Rehabilitation Center
This text of 37 So. 3d 272 (United Automobile Insurance Company v. Hollywood Injury Rehabilitation Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues raised in this petition for writ of certiorari are identical to those raised in United Automobile Insurance Company. v. Santa Fe Medical Center, a/a/o Telmo Lopez, 21 So.3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). On the authority of that opinion, we conclude that the trial court, sitting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of law when it affirmed a summary judgment and imposed sanctions against petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company and/or its counsel. Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari.
Petition granted, decision quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 So. 3d 272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20379, 2009 WL 5126372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-insurance-company-v-hollywood-injury-rehabilitation-fladistctapp-2009.