United Automobile Insurance Company v. Hollywood Injury Rehabilitation Center

37 So. 3d 272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20379, 2009 WL 5126372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2009·No. 3D08-2504·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issues raised in this petition for writ of certiorari are identical to those raised in United Automobile Insurance Company. v. Santa Fe Medical Center, a/a/o Telmo Lopez, 21 So.3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). On the authority of that opinion, we conclude that the trial court, sitting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of law when it affirmed a summary judgment and imposed sanctions against petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company and/or its counsel. Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Petition granted, decision quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Automobile Insurance Company v. Hollywood Injury Rehabilitation Center, 37 So. 3d 272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20379, 2009 WL 5126372 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

37 So. 3d 272 (United Automobile Insurance Company v. Hollywood Injury Rehabilitation Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Santa Fe Medical Center
21 So. 3d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)