UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH CARE FAMILY REHABILITATION CENTER CORP., A/A/O ANTHONY ROMAN

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2022
Docket21-0824
StatusPublished

This text of UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH CARE FAMILY REHABILITATION CENTER CORP., A/A/O ANTHONY ROMAN (UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH CARE FAMILY REHABILITATION CENTER CORP., A/A/O ANTHONY ROMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH CARE FAMILY REHABILITATION CENTER CORP., A/A/O ANTHONY ROMAN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 27, 2022. ________________

No. 3D21-824 Lower Tribunal No. 19-262 SP ________________

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,

vs.

Health Care Family Rehabilitation Center Corp., a/a/o Anthony Roman, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Stephanie Silver, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

Fleites Law, P.A., and Katiana B. Fleites, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

United Automobile Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s

February 25, 2021, final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs in

favor of appellee.

United Auto disputed, in material respects, appellee’s motion for

attorney’s fees and costs, including a dispute as to the reasonable number

of hours expended by appellee’s attorney. The trial court’s order provided

that nine hours were reasonably expended by appellee’s counsel. However,

and as appellee has properly and commendably conceded, the trial court

failed to make written findings to support such a determination, as required

by section 627.736(8), Florida Statutes (2021). 1

1 That subsection provides in pertinent part:

With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730- 627.7405 between the insured and the insurer, or between an assignee of an insured's rights and the insurer, the provisions of ss. 627.428 and 768.79 apply, except as provided in subsections (10) and (15), and except that any attorney fees recovered must:

(a) Comply with prevailing professional standards; (b) Not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity; and (c) Represent legal services that are reasonable and necessary to achieve the result obtained.

Upon request by either party, a judge must make written findings, substantiated by evidence presented at trial or any hearings

2 We therefore vacate the order on appeal and remand the cause for

entry of an order that complies with section 627.736(8), Florida Statutes.

Order vacated and cause remanded. 2

associated therewith, that any award of attorney fees complies with this subsection. 2 Given our disposition on appellee’s confession of error, we do not reach the other claims raised by United Auto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEALTH CARE FAMILY REHABILITATION CENTER CORP., A/A/O ANTHONY ROMAN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-insurance-company-v-health-care-family-rehabilitation-fladistctapp-2022.