United Automobile Insurance Co. v. O'Shields
This text of 868 So. 2d 576 (United Automobile Insurance Co. v. O'Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The denial of defendant/appellant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs is affirmed without prejudice, and the said Motion may be renewed after the trial court determines whether the plaintiff/appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees and, if the appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees, the amount of those fees. It should be noted that, through this Opinion, this Court declines to make a finding as to whether the plaintiff/appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
868 So. 2d 576, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668, 2004 WL 298723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-insurance-co-v-oshields-fladistctapp-2004.