UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron
This text of 775 So. 2d 372 (UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Benita E. PADRON, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*373 Perez, Goran & Rodriguez and Luis N. Perez, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Laurie S. Moss, Davie, and Diane H. Tutt, Plantation, for appellees.
Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by determining the lodestar amount of attorneys' fees or by applying a 1.5 contingency risk multiplier, we affirm the award of attorneys' fees. See Centex-Rooney Constr. Co. v. Martin County, 725 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 So. 2d 372, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15188, 2000 WL 1726922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-automobile-ins-co-v-padron-fladistctapp-2000.