United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

61 A.D.2d 1010, 402 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10642, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8796, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1978·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, [1011]*10111977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 61 A.D.2d 1010, 402 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10642, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8796, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

61 A.D.2d 1010 (United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related