United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

61 A.D.2d 1010, 402 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10642, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8796, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1010 (United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 61 A.D.2d 1010, 402 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10642, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8796, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, [1011]*10111977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, [1011]*10111977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 1010, 402 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10642, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8796, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-air-lines-inc-v-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack