United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Feldman Investments Co

District Court, C.D. California·Decided November 2, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-05319·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05319-FMO-JEM Document 16 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:82

JS-6 UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN ABILITIES ) Case No. CV 22-5319 FMO (JEMx) CLUB et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT v. ) PREJUDICE ) FELDMAN INVESTMENTS CO., et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 15, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than December 2, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated this 2nd day of November, 2022. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Feldman Investments Co, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Feldman Investments Co (United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Feldman Investments Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Davis v. McGrew
23 P. 41 (California Supreme Court, 1889)