Unite Here! Local 5 v. City and County of Honolulu

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 20, 2010
Docket28602
StatusPublished

This text of Unite Here! Local 5 v. City and County of Honolulu (Unite Here! Local 5 v. City and County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unite Here! Local 5 v. City and County of Honolulu, (haw 2010).

Opinion

LAW Lzaa,@av

NO. 28602

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAfI

?"*~B

§

civil N@. 06-~1-0265 §

UNITE HERE! LOCAL 5; ERIC W. GILL; §§ TODD A.K. MARTIN, PlaintiffS, §§ vs. §§

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporaQgon; no TURTLE BAY RESORT, L.L.C.,l a Hawai‘i corporation, Def§ndants2

and

TURTLE BAY RESORT, L.L.C., a HaWafi general partnership, Counterclaim Plaintiff,

VS.

UNITE HERE! LoCAL 5 HAWA:‘I, a Hawai‘i labor organization,- ERIC W. GILL, an individual, Counterclaim Defendants.

Civil No. 06-l-0867 KEEP THE NORTH SHORE COUNTRY, a HawaFi non-profit corporation; and SIERRA CLUB, HAWAfI CHAPTER, a foreign non~profit corporation, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; HENRY ENG, Director of Department of Planning and Permitting, in his official capacity; TURTLE BAY RESORT, L.L.C., a Hawafi general partnership, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIV. NOS. 06-l-O265 & O6~l-O867)

1 By order of this court, filed June 29, 20lO, Turtle Bay Resort, L.L.C. was substituted for Kuilima Bay Resort.

_l_

ORDER DENYING MOTlON FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama and Duffy, JJ.; and Circuit Judge Chan, in place of Recktenwald, J., recused; Acoba, J., dissenting) Upon consideration of respondent/defendant-appellee Turtle Bay Resort, L.L.C.'s Motion for Reconsideration, filed Apri1 19, 201O,2 the papers in support and in opposition thereto, and the record herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. See Sierra Cluh v. Department of Transportation, 115 HawaiU,299, 167 P.3d 292 (2007).

DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUd July 20,“2010.

Terence J. O'Too1e, Sharon V. Lovejoy Lane Hornfeck McKay,

and Shyla P. Cockett (of Starn £>

0 Toole Marcus & Fisher) for ”“¢4“~£ /5LfVH respondent/defendant-appellee

Turtle Bay Resort L.L.C. &é“L€_gqMb‘9H

william S. Hunt and Laura P.

Couch (of Alston Hunt Floyd & z2““¢q%k2z

Ing) and Rory R. wicks (of Coast Law Group, Encinitas, CA), appearing pro hac vice, for petitioners/p1aintiffs- appellants

No. 28602 Unite Here! v. Cit'y' & Countv of Honolulu -- Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration

2 By order of this court, filed June 22, 2010, the time to dispose the motion for reconsideration was extended to July 30, 2010.

_2_ .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation
167 P.3d 292 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Unite Here! Local 5 v. City and County of Honolulu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unite-here-local-5-v-city-and-county-of-honolulu-haw-2010.