Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings
624 So. 2d 750, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9094, 1993 WL 337512
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 So. 2d 131 →
Opinion
We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order compelling disclosure of information which the parties did not dispute constituted a trade secret. Respondents failed to meet-their burden to demonstrate that such disclosure was reasonably necessary. See Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Egly, 507 So.2d 1180, 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Cooey, 359 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); East Colonial Refuse Service, Inc. v. Velocci, 416 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 624 So. 2d 750, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9094, 1993 WL 337512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
624 So. 2d 750 (Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Egly
507 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
East Colonial Refuse Service, Inc. v. Velocci
416 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Cooey
359 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)