Unique Sports Products, Inc v. Ferrari Importing Company

505 F. App'x 863
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 2013
Docket12-12829
StatusUnpublished

This text of 505 F. App'x 863 (Unique Sports Products, Inc v. Ferrari Importing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unique Sports Products, Inc v. Ferrari Importing Company, 505 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Unique Sports Products, Inc. appeals the judgment the District Court entered in accordance with its May 15, 2012 order granting Ferrari Importing Company’s, d/b/a Gamma Sports, motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief. The District Court dismissed with prejudice Unique’s claim that Gamma’s use of its String Survey rankings .constituted false and misleading representations of fact in its commercial advertising and promotions in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and dismissed without prejudice Unique’s claim under Georgia’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

The District Court dismissed Unique’s Lanham Act claim on the basis of our decision in Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald’s Corp., 489 F.3d 1156 (11th Cir.2007), concluding that McDonald’s controlled its disposition of that claim. We agree and therefore affirm the District Court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp.
489 F.3d 1156 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unique-sports-products-inc-v-ferrari-importing-company-ca11-2013.