Unique Art Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. T. Cohn, Inc.
This text of 178 F.2d 403 (Unique Art Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. T. Cohn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
178 F.2d 403
83 U.S.P.Q. 533
UNIQUE ART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T. COHN, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 85, Docket 21363.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1949.
Decided Dec. 20, 1949.
Dean, Fairbank & Hirsch, New York City (Morris Hirsch and A. B. Colwin, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Moch & Blum, Neu York City (Ashur Blum, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, 81 F.Supp. 742, on the authority of the following decisions of the Second Circuit: Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co., 247 F. 299; Shredded Wheat Co. v. Humphrey Cornell Co., 250 F. 960; Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk Corp., 35 F.2d 279; A. C. Gilbert Co. v. Shemitz, 45 F.2d 98, 100; Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. Mfg. Co., Inc., 109 F.2d 566; California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, 162 F.2d 893, 174 A.L.R. 481; Lucien Lelong, Inc. v. Lander Co., 164 F.2d 395; S. C. Johnson & Sons v. Johnson, 175 F.2d 176.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 F.2d 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unique-art-manufacturing-company-inc-v-t-cohn-inc-ca2-1949.