Uniontown Building & Loan Association's Appeal
This text of 92 Pa. 200 (Uniontown Building & Loan Association's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered November 28th 1879,
The learned auditor and the court below were right, we think, in holding that the Boyce judgments were entitled to be paid according to their priority. The holders of those judgments were not bound to claim their money from the first fund produced by the sale of the debtor’s estate. If there were any equities in these appellants they should have given notice to them to make such claims; for a judgment or mortgage-creditor is not bound to know of the existence of any subsequent encumbrance. The appellants contend that Mackintosh, Hemphill & Co., who purchased the Boyce judgments, stand in a different position from what Boyce himself would have done. But we are unable to see' why that should be so, and affirm this decree upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 Pa. 200, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uniontown-building-loan-associations-appeal-pa-1879.