Union Trust Co. v. Roth0
755 A.2d 239, 58 Conn. App. 481, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 285
Opinion
Opinion
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the owner of the equity of redemption appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to reopen the judgment and to extend the sale date. Whether to grant a motion to open rests in the discretion of the trial court. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Stage Harbor Corp., 181 Conn. 141, 143, 434 A.2d 341 (1980). The court did not abuse its discretion in this case.
The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Trust Co. v. Roth0, 755 A.2d 239, 58 Conn. App. 481, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 285 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).
755 A.2d 239 (Union Trust Co. v. Roth0) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Russo
84 A.3d 1204 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014)
Industrial Mold & Tool, Inc. v. Zaleski
78 A.3d 218 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Citibank, N.A. v. Lindland
27 A.3d 423 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLC
966 A.2d 239 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)