Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Union Trust Co. v. Roth0

Union Trust Co. v. Roth0

755 A.2d 239, 58 Conn. App. 481, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 285
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJune 27, 2000
DocketAC 18499
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 755 A.2d 239 (Union Trust Co. v. Roth0) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Trust Co. v. Roth0, 755 A.2d 239, 58 Conn. App. 481, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 285 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, the owner of the equity of redemption appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to reopen the judgment and to extend the sale date. Whether to grant a motion to open rests in the discretion of the trial court. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Stage Harbor Corp., 181 Conn. 141, 143, 434 A.2d 341 (1980). The court did not abuse its discretion in this case.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Russo
84 A.3d 1204 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014)
Industrial Mold & Tool, Inc. v. Zaleski
78 A.3d 218 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Citibank, N.A. v. Lindland
27 A.3d 423 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLC
966 A.2d 239 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
755 A.2d 239, 58 Conn. App. 481, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-trust-co-v-roth0-connappct-2000.