Union Trust Co. v. Francis

242 A.D. 674

This text of 242 A.D. 674 (Union Trust Co. v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Trust Co. v. Francis, 242 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it was within the discretion of the Special Term to deny the motion inasmuch as it was not made within ten days after the service of the amended answer (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109; Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308), and no explanation of the laches was offered. AH concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. Hirsch
205 A.D. 308 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-trust-co-v-francis-nyappdiv-1934.