Union Trust Co. v. Francis
242 A.D. 674
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it was within the discretion of the Special Term to deny the motion inasmuch as it was not made within ten days after the service of the amended answer (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109; Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308), and no explanation of the laches was offered. AH concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Trust Co. v. Francis, 242 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 674 (Union Trust Co. v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. Hirsch
205 A.D. 308 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)