Union Trust Co. v. Cole

198 A.D. 539, 190 N.Y.S. 858, 1921 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Union Trust Co. v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 198 A.D. 534

Opinion

Page, J.:

The appellants’ counsel, on the argument of the appeal, stated that the motion was made to vacate the judgment [540]*540because the attorney who appeared for them had failed to serve a notice of appeal from the judgment, he representing, as was contended, conflicting interests. Our determination of the appeal taken by the guardian ad litem, for the infant defendants, decided herewith (198 App. Div. 534), affects all of the class of which the appellants herein are a part, and will inure to their benefit although they did not appeal. (Matter of Union Trust Co. [Detmold], 219 N. Y. 537.) If we should reverse the order and grant the motion, the appellants could not obtain a more favorable result than they will obtain -from a modification of the judgment directed on the other appeal.

The appellants may have leave to withdraw their appeal, without costs.

Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling and Merrell, JJ., concur.

The appellants may have leave to withdraw their appeal, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Trust Co. v. Cole, 198 A.D. 539, 190 N.Y.S. 858, 1921 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

198 A.D. 539 (Union Trust Co. v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Accounting of Union Trust Co.
114 N.E. 1048 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Union Trust Co. v. Cole
198 A.D. 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)