Union Trust Co. v. Barnhardt
This text of 245 A.D. 829 (Union Trust Co. v. Barnhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action upon a promissory note, in which the trial justice directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs at the close of the entire case, judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that the trial court erred in not submitting to the jury the question as to whether the notice of protest had been properly mailed to the defendant in view of the testimony of the defendant that he had never received such notice at his place of residence, to which, in [830]*830accordance with the affidavit of the notary, it had been mailed. (Townsend v. Avid, 10 Misc. 343; Meise v. Newman, 76 Hun, 341.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-trust-co-v-barnhardt-nyappdiv-1935.