Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. Conway

238 A.D. 764
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. No answer has been served, and there is nothing in the record from which it can be determined what matters in the ease are to be litigated. The testimony sought to be obtained is not necessary to enable the defendant to answer. Until the issues are determined the court cannot say whether or not the testimony sought to be obtained is material and necessary, and under such circumstances no examination before trial can be had. (Welsh v. Cowles Shipyard Co., Inc., 200 App. Div. 724; Walczewski v. American Laundry Machinery Co., 236 id. 883; Noble v. Copake Pure Ice & Water [Corp., 129 Misc. 445.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. Conway, 238 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 764 (Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. Conway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Probate of the Will of Beck
11 Misc. 2d 31 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Probate of the Will of Baum
7 Misc. 2d 937 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Probate of the Will of Carll
201 Misc. 829 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1951)
In re the Probate of the Will of Sheeler
195 Misc. 187 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)