Union Trust Co., Exr. v. Burke

11 N.E.2d 55, 104 Ind. App. 353, 1937 Ind. App. LEXIS 58
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1937·No. No. 16,117.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bridwell, J.

Appellee has entered her special appearance herein, and filed motion to dismiss this appeal, averring in said motion that the appeal was not taken “within the time allowed by law.”

Appellee asserts, and the record discloses, that appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and final judgment on a verdict returned by a jury rendered April 23, 1937; that, thereafter, on October 22, 1937, appellant filed with the clerk of this court a transcript of the record together with its assignment of errors thereon. It thus appears that more than 180 days elapsed between the date of rendition of final judgment and the filing of the appeal in this court.

In the absence of fraud, and no such claim is made in the instant case, the longest time allowed for the perfecting of an appeal from any judgment is 180 days from the date when the judgment becomes final, such length of time being granted by the *354 provisions of section 2-3202 “Burns Ind. Stat. Anno. 1933, §472 Baldwin’s 1934. The attempted appeal not having been perfected within the time allowed by law for that purpose, the motion to dismiss should be and is sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Trust Co., Exr. v. Burke, 11 N.E.2d 55, 104 Ind. App. 353, 1937 Ind. App. LEXIS 58 (Ind. Ct. App. 1937).

11 N.E.2d 55 (Union Trust Co., Exr. v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Means v. Seif Material Handling Company
300 N.E.2d 895 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
TOURKOW, ADMR. v. Hoover
108 N.E.2d 195 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1952)
Drzewiecki v. George
40 N.E.2d 1004 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1942)