Union Traction Co. v. Wolf
This text of 127 N.E. 564 (Union Traction Co. v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee has failed to file any brief. 'It has been repeatedly held by this court and by the Supreme Court that a failure on the part of the appellee to file a brief may be treated as a confession of error, warranting reversal. Eigelsbach v. Kanne (1915), 184 Ind. 62, 110 N. E. 549; Huddleston v. Huddleston (1916), 184 Ind. 168, 110 N. E. 980; Veit v. Windhorst (1916), 184 Ind. 351, 110 N. E. 666. Having examined [393]*393appellant’s brief, we are satisfied that in this case the rule should be invoked.
Judgment reversed, with instruction to the trial court to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 N.E. 564, 73 Ind. App. 392, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-traction-co-v-wolf-indctapp-1920.