Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Dumond

Illinois Supreme Court

Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Dumond

37 N.E. 863, 150 Ill. 501, 1894 Ill. LEXIS 1631

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJune 19, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 N.E. 863 (Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Dumond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Dumond, 37 N.E. 863, 150 Ill. 501, 1894 Ill. LEXIS 1631 (Ill. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The facts in this case, except dates, parties and the amount of recovery, are in all essential particulars identical with those in Drovers’ Nat. Bank v. O’Hare, 119 Ill. 646, and precisely the same questions are presented for our determination. If the case was one of first impression in this court, we should feel disposed to give greater weight to citations and argument of counsel than we can now do. We have given that consideration to the matter which the importance of the question demands and the very able argument of counsel merits, and are not inclined to recede from the holding in that case.

It is admitted by counsel that every question here involved is determined in the O’Hare ease, and if that is adhered to, as we think must be done, it is conclusive of this case. It follows, necessarily, that upon the authority of the O’Hare ease this judgment must be affirmed, and it is accordingly so done.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The facts in this case, except dates, parties and the amount of recovery, are in all essential particulars identical with those in Drovers’ Nat. Bank v. O’Hare, 119 Ill. 646, and precisely the same questions are presented for our determination. If the case was one of first impression in this court, we should feel disposed to give greater weight to citations and argument of counsel than we can now do. We have given that consideration to the matter which the importance of the question demands and the very able argument of counsel merits, and are not inclined to recede from the holding in that case.

It is admitted by counsel that every question here involved is determined in the O’Hare ease, and if that is adhered to, as we think must be done, it is conclusive of this case. It follows, necessarily, that upon the authority of the O’Hare ease this judgment must be affirmed, and it is accordingly so done.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 N.E. 863, 150 Ill. 501, 1894 Ill. LEXIS 1631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-stock-yards-national-bank-v-dumond-ill-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack