Home/Supreme Court/Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. Mayhall & Neible

Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. Mayhall & Neible

262 U.S. 731, 43 S. Ct. 699, 67 L. Ed. 1205, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2691
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 21, 1923
DocketNo. 409
StatusPublished

This text of 262 U.S. 731 (Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. Mayhall & Neible) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. Mayhall & Neible, 262 U.S. 731, 43 S. Ct. 699, 67 L. Ed. 1205, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2691 (1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, [732]*732252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Mr. Norris Brown and Mr. Irving F. Baxter for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. A. McLaughlin, Mr. Francis A. Brogan, Mr. Alfred G. Ellick, Mr. Anon Raymond, Mr. Bruce Scott and Mr. Byron Clark for defendants in error. [See post, 757.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 U.S. 731, 43 S. Ct. 699, 67 L. Ed. 1205, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-stock-yards-co-of-omaha-ltd-v-mayhall-neible-scotus-1923.