Union Steel v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Union Steel v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 713 F.3d 1101
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 8, 2012·No. 2012-1248·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNION STEEL, LG HAUSYS, LTD., LG HAUSYS AMERICA, INC., n AND DONGBU STEEL CO., LTD, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

V

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

AND ‘

NUCOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee,

AND

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1248, -1315

Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated case n0. 11-CV-0083, Judge Jane A. Restani.

ON MOTION

UNION STEEL V. US 2

ORDER

United States Steel Corporation moves without opposi- tion for a 50-day extension of time, until September 14, 2012, for the United States, Nucor Corporation and United States Steel Corporation to file their response briefs

Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FoR THE COURT

AUG 08 2012 /S/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba]y Clerk

ccc L. Misha Preheim, Esq. Donald Cameron, Jr., Esq. FILEB Timothy C. Brightbill, Esq. U.S.CUUHTOFAPPB\LS FUH Jeffrey D. Gerrish, Esq. THE FEDERAL C[RCU`T 826 Aue 03 zmz

JAN HOHBALV CI.EHK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Steel v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Union Steel v. United States (Union Steel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.