Union Square Supply, Inc. v. De Blasio

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X UNION SQUARE SU PPLY INC., individually a nd on behalf of a class of all other persons s imilarl y situa ted, Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 2390 (DLC)

-against- JUDGMENT

MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND WORKER PROTECTION, LORELAI SALAS, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS & HEARINGS, JONI KLETTER, as Commissioner and Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, INSPECTOR DAVI, and INSPECTOR J OHN DOE(S) AND INSPECTOR JANE DOE(S), t o be id entified later, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 16, 2021, The City’s motion to

dismiss is granted. Because Union Square Supply has had an

opportunity to amend its complaint in response to the City’s

motion to dismiss, has failed to address the complaint’s

deficiencies, and has not requested further leave to amend, the

dismissal of Union Square Supply’s federal claims is with

prejudice. See TechnoMarine SA v. Giftports, Inc., 758 F.3d 493,

505-06 (2d Cir. 2014). The state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to renewal in state court. Judgment is entered for the defendants and this case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York November 17, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Covet / BY: . ) ‘ Deputy Clerk