Union School Township v. Brown

Indiana Court of Appeals

Union School Township v. Brown

120 N.E. 393, 68 Ind. App. 319, 1918 Ind. App. LEXIS 72

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 1918

DocketNo. 10,239

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.E. 393 (Union School Township v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union School Township v. Brown, 120 N.E. 393, 68 Ind. App. 319, 1918 Ind. App. LEXIS 72 (Ind. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Ibach, J.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the sureties on the appeal bond, which was filed on December 31, 1917, were not named by the court at the term in which final judgment was rendered, and that such bond has not at any subsequent term been approved by .the court.

After the filing of appellee’s motion the appellant applied for, and was granted, an extension of time in which to file its brief, to and including August 1,1918. No further extension of time was requested, and appellant’s briefs are not on file. Under such condition of the record, a consideration of appellee’s motion is rendered unnecessary, as in any event the cause would have to be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ibach, J.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the sureties on the appeal bond, which was filed on December 31, 1917, were not named by the court at the term in which final judgment was rendered, and that such bond has not at any subsequent term been approved by .the court.

After the filing of appellee’s motion the appellant applied for, and was granted, an extension of time in which to file its brief, to and including August 1,1918. No further extension of time was requested, and appellant’s briefs are not on file. Under such condition of the record, a consideration of appellee’s motion is rendered unnecessary, as in any event the cause would have to be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 393.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.E. 393, 68 Ind. App. 319, 1918 Ind. App. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-school-township-v-brown-indctapp-1918.