Union Railway Co. v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad
This text of 41 A. 1119 (Union Railway Co. v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There is but little difference in the facts of this case, from those in No. 199, January term, 1897, between the same par[116]*116ties, ante, p. 105, in which a decree has been this day handed down. The plaintiff proposes to construct a crossing on Edgmont avenue, a north and south street, though not a straight one, as is Welsh street in the other case; it already has a grade crossing on Market street, only twenty feet from the proposed avenue crossing, and another on Potter street, four squares east. This one is sought solely to promote convenience in operating their road; the danger to the public and the injury to the steam road are just as great as in the other case ; besides, it is reasonably practicable to avoid the grade by an overhead crossing.
The decree of the court below is reversed and injunction dissolved at costs of appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A. 1119, 188 Pa. 115, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-railway-co-v-philadelphia-wilmington-baltimore-railroad-pa-1898.