Union Pacific Railroad v. Sides

231 U.S. 213, 34 S. Ct. 107, 58 L. Ed. 189, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2490
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 1, 1913
Docket683
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 231 U.S. 213 (Union Pacific Railroad v. Sides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Pacific Railroad v. Sides, 231 U.S. 213, 34 S. Ct. 107, 58 L. Ed. 189, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2490 (1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action in ejectment, brought by plaintiff in error, called here plaintiff, .against defendants in error, here called defendants, in the District Court of Arapahoe County, State of Colorado.

Except’ as to the description of the land the complaint is substantially the same as that in No. 682 and presents the same legal rights and titles. Defendant Sides demurred to the complaint-; Scherrer denied-being in possession of the land and disclaimed any claim to it. The demurrer was overruled and Scherrer answered, setting up defenses which are in substance the same as in No. 682. To the defenses plaintiff filed demurrers, which were abstained. Sides elécted to plead no further and the case coming on for trial and certain facts being agreed upon as testified to, objection to the materiality of which was made, motions to dismiss and for judgment were also made and overruled. Judgment was entered for plaintiff. It was reversed by the Supreme Court of the State, for the reasons stated in its opinion in Snow v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., that is, No. 682, ante, p. 204, 133 Pac. Rep. 1040.

This. case was submitted with No. 682, involves the same questions and is determined by its decision.-

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Mu. Justice Hughes dissents. -' Mr. Justice Holmes and Mr. Justice. Pitney took no part in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carscadden v. Territory of Alaska
105 F.2d 377 (Ninth Circuit, 1939)
State ex rel. Hahler v. Grimes
148 N.W. 942 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 U.S. 213, 34 S. Ct. 107, 58 L. Ed. 189, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-pacific-railroad-v-sides-scotus-1913.