Union Pacific Railroad v. Fickenscher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Union Pacific Railroad v. Fickenscher

110 N.W. 567, 77 Neb. 608, 1906 Neb. LEXIS 144

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 7, 1906

DocketNo. 12,592

StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.W. 567 (Union Pacific Railroad v. Fickenscher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Union Pacific Railroad v. Fickenscher, 110 N.W. 567, 77 Neb. 608, 1906 Neb. LEXIS 144 (Neb. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Sedgwick, C. J.

This action was brought in the district court for Dawson county to recover damages caused by a fire alleged to have originated in the carelessness of the defendant. The case was argued and submitted with the motion for rehearing in the case of Union P. R. Co. v. Fickenscher, 74 Neb. 507, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded.,

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedgwick, C. J.

This action was brought in the district court for Dawson county to recover damages caused by a fire alleged to have originated in the carelessness of the defendant. The case was argued and submitted with the motion for rehearing in the case of Union P. R. Co. v. Fickenscher, 74 Neb. 507, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded.,

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.W. 567, 77 Neb. 608, 1906 Neb. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-pacific-railroad-v-fickenscher-neb-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack