Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Merlinda Vigil, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Phillip Vigil
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD § COMPANY, No. 08-15-00329-CV §
Appellant, Appeal from the §
v. County Court at Law No. 5 §
MERLINDA VIGIL, INDIVIDUALLY of El Paso County, Texas AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE § ESTATE OF ANDREW PHILLIP (TC#2015DCV2273) VIGIL, §
Appellee. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Union Pacific Railroad Company has filed a motion to vacate the trial court’s order denying its special appearance and to dismiss the appeal as moot. Appellee, Merlinda Vigil, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Phillip Vigil, is unopposed to the motion.
Vigil filed suit against Union Pacific after her husband was fatally injured in New Mexico. Union Pacific filed a special appearance, and alternatively, moved to transfer the case to Harris County. The trial court denied the special appearance, but granted Union Pacific’s request to transfer venue to Harris County. Union Pacific timely filed notice of appeal from the denial of its special appearance. Vigil subsequently filed a notice of nonsuit.
In its motion, Union Pacific asserts that we should vacate the order denying its special
appearance and dismiss the appeal as moot because a nonsuit, as a general rule, vitiates prior interlocutory orders. See Le v. Kilpatrick, 112 S.W.3d 631, 633 (Tex.App.--Tyler 2003, no pet.) (citing In re Bennett, 960 S.W.2d 35, 38 (Tex. 1997)). A nonsuit does not vitiate a venue determination or a decision on the merits such as a partial summary judgment, but an order denying a special appearance is vitiated when the plaintiff takes a nonsuit. See Le, 112 S.W.3d at 633-34. Accordingly, we grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s order denying the special appearance, and dismiss the interlocutory appeal as moot. See Le, 112 S.W.3d at 635.
STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice December 18, 2015
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Merlinda Vigil, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Phillip Vigil (Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Merlinda Vigil, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Phillip Vigil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.