Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrison

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 1, 2022
Docket14-21-00435-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrison (Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00435-CV

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

V.

EDGAR HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TWYNCEOLA BATISTE DECEASED); HENRY HARRISON; JOHNNY HAYES; ARTINCE HEATHMON; RONALD HENDERSON; ANNIE HILL; ROBERT JAMES HILLARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JANELL HILLARD (DECEASED); CHARLENE HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LOUISE WILLIAMS (DECEASED); SHAWNA JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE WILLIAM JACKSON (DECEASED); CLAYTON JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BARBARA ROBERTSON (DECEASED); JENNIFER JACKSON; KAREN MAYES JACKSON; LULA MAE JACOBS; ANGELA JACOBS-WHITE; DONNIE JEFFERSON; DANYELLE JEFFERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BARBARA A. MILES (DECEASED); ROY JEFFERSON; DONALD JACKSON; NATALIE JOHNSON; RAYMOND JOHNSON; LEONARD JOHNSON; RODRICK JOHNSON; ALBERTA JOHNSON; FRANCIS JOHNSON; FERN JONES; JOSEPH LADAY; BONNIE FAYE LANDERY; UELLA ELDER- MCPHERSON; LESTER MURPHY, JR.; MAGGIE NASH; RICHARD NASH; MONICA ODUMS-ORTIZ; RANULFO OJEDA, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARIA MARGARITA OJEDA (DECEASED); DIANNE OSBORNE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LEONARD SUTTON (DECEASED); ANNIE PARKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES HOLMAN (DECEASED); RITA PAYNE-JORDAN; BOBBIE PENNAMON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT PENNAMON (DECEASED); CATHERINE PETERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF EMILY PETERSON (DECEASED); RANDY PETERSON; DELORES PETERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD PETERSON (DECEASED); YVONNE PHILLIPS; GREGORY POTIER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES VIC POTIER (DECEASED); SIRCAR PRADIA; MARY ELLIS RANDLE; AND JAMES RANDLE, JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-22019

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is a statutory interlocutory appeal from an order signed June 28, 2021. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 27.003, 51.015(12). On August 23, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 27.003
Texas CP § 27.003

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-pacific-railroad-company-v-edgar-harrison-texapp-2022.